 |
| |
 
 |
2006 |
|
(100)
« L’économie, science des intérêts
passionnés », introduction à la republication
de Gabriel Tarde, Psychologie économique,
Paris, Les Empêcheurs (avec Vincent Lépinay). (publication
sous forme de livret independant publication as an independant
pamphlet).
[Publication
d’un extrait publication of an extract in «
L'économie est subjective donc quantifiable » in p
379-384 in Michel Wieviorka Les sciences sociales en mutation,
Editions Sciences Humaines, Auxerre, 2007.]
[2009:Traduction en espagnol Spanish translation, La
economia, ciencia de los intereses apasionados – Introduccion
a la antropologia economica de Garbiel Tarde, Manantial,
Buenos Aires, 2009]
[2009:
The Science of Passionate Interests. An introduction to Gabriel
Tarde's Economic Anthropology, 2009,
Prickly Paradigm Press]
[200-: Traduction en allemand German translation, Suhrkamp,
Francfort]
Gabriel
Tarde’s book on economics is the last one he published. It
has been totally forgotten even though it is a masterpiece of social
psychology. In many ways one can say that Tarde has been founding
the sociology and anthropology of markets. His key contribution
is that far from adding social elements to the cold calculation
of economics, Tarde shows that in order to quantify relations of
attachements between people and goods, one has to take into account
the psychological aspects. The more you psychologize it (in Tarde
specific sense of intra and not inter psychology) the more you will
be able to quantify it. He uses this argument to criticize Marxism,
to expose the weaknesses of social darwininism, to propose a solution
to the so called « Adam Smith’s problem » and
has a myriad of other insights about a question which has never
been more important than today. The foreword presents the program
and summarizes the part that have been cut from this edition.
bonnes
feuilles de l'introduction
|
(99) "A
Textbook Case Revisited. Knowledge as mode of existence"
E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch and J. Wacjman (edtors), The
Handbook of Science and Technology Studies –Third Edition,
(2007) pp. 83-112, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
The paper starts by a visit to an
exhibit at the Natural History Museum in New York which shows in
parallel series of fossils of horse evolution and series of how
paleontologists have varied in their reconstruction of this evolution.
It is the occasion to test again an argument at the heart of science
studies and history of science : is there a history of science ideas
about nature, or also a history of the objects known by science.
If the latter is the case, then do we have the philosophical ressource
to think this change of conception through ? Using James, Fleck,
Whitehead and more recent science studies results, the paper tries
to « desepistemologize » knowledge on the one hand while
« reontologizing » it on the other.
[Traduction française partial
partial French translation par Christelle Gramaglia et
et David Jamar « La connaissance est-elle un mode d’existence
: rencontre au muséum de James, de Fleck et de Whitehead
avec des fossiles de chevaux » in Didier Debaise Vie
et expérimentation : Peirce, James, Dewey (sous
la direction de) Vrin Paris, pp.17-44, 2007.]
|
| (98)
« A propos d'un livre
d'Etienne Souriau Les différents modes d'existence»,
(publié sur le web uniquement).
[version
abrégée shortened version « Plularité
des manières d’être » in Agenda
de la pensée contemporaine, Printemps 2007,
n°7 pp.171-194]
[Traduction anglaise English translation by Stephen Muecke «
Reflections on Etienne Souriau’s Les Modes d’existence
», in (edited by Graham Harman, Levi Bryant and Nick Srnicek
The Speculative Turn re.press Australia), re.press,
Melbourne, Australie]
In a totally forgotten book, Etienne
Souriau, a mid 20th century philosopher had very daringly proposed
to tackle straight on the question of the plurivocity of being not,
as is so often the case in the history of philosophy, by offering
variations on the one central mode –that is knowledge- but
by insisting that there might exist entirely different modes. Feeding
on the key notion that prepositions too are given in experience,
as James said, it is one of the most extraordinary enterprises to
give flesh to James’ notion of pluriverse. Since the notion
of mode of existence is so germane to the notion of regimes of enunciation,
a close reading of Souriau’s book is called for.
|


  
|